Menu

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Online Case Solution

Home >> Accounting >> Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Solution and Analysis


Introduction

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Help is presently one of the greatest food chains worldwide. It was established by Henri Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially introduced "Farine Lactee"; a mix of flour and milk to reduce and feed babies death rate. At the very same time, the Page brothers from Switzerland also found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Business. The 2 became competitors at first but later merged in 1905, resulting in the birth of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is now a transnational company. Unlike other international companies, it has senior executives from different nations and tries to make decisions thinking about the entire world. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Help presently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread throughout 86 countries.

Function

The purpose of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Corporation is to improve the quality of life of people by playing its part and providing healthy food. While making sure that the company is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future

Vision

Nestlé's vision is to supply its clients with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be innovative and at the same time understand the requirements and requirements of its clients. Its vision is to grow fast and provide items that would satisfy the needs of each age. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B visualizes to develop a trained workforce which would help the business to grow.

Objective.

Nestlé's objective is that as currently, it is the leading company in the food industry, it thinks in 'Excellent Food, Great Life". Its mission is to offer its customers with a variety of options that are healthy and best in taste. It is focused on supplying the best food to its customers throughout the day and night.

Products.
Executive Summary
Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has a broad variety of products that it uses to its consumers. In 2011, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B was listed as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives.

• Bearing in mind the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has put down its objectives and goals. These goals and goals are noted below.
• One goal of the business is to reach absolutely no land fill status.
• Another goal of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is to waste minimum food throughout production. Usually, the food produced is lost even before it reaches the consumers.
• Another thing that Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is working on is to enhance its packaging in such a method that it would assist it to decrease those problems and would also ensure the shipment of high quality of its products to its consumers.
• Meet global standards of the environment.
• Build a relationship based on trust with its consumers, service partners, staff members, and government.

Critical Problems.

Just Recently, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Company is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its earnings on the R&D technology. The nation is investing more on mergers and acquisitions to support its NHW method. The target of the company is not accomplished as the sales were anticipated to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Display H. There is a requirement to focus more on the sales then the innovation technology. Otherwise, it may result in the decreased revenue rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.
Porter's 5 Forces Analysis
Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals.

The present Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B method is based upon the principle of Nutritious, Health and Health (NHW). This strategy deals with the idea to bringing change in the client choices about food and making the food stuff much healthier concerning about the health problems.

The vision of this technique is based on the secret technique i.e. 60/40+ which merely implies that the products will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional worth. The items will be produced with additional dietary value in contrast to all other items in market acquiring it a plus on its nutritional material.

This technique was embraced to bring more delicious plus healthy foods and beverages in market than ever. In competition with other companies, with an objective of keeping its trust over clients as Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Company has gotten more relied on by costumers.

Microenvironment Analysis (PESTEL Analysis).

The analysis utilized to measure the position of company in the market is done by utilizing PESTLE analysis, provided in Exhibition A. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B works under the guidelines and rules directed by government and food authority. The business is more focused on its items and services to make sure about the product quality and security.

Political.
Swot Analysis
Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is significantly supported by Government to satisfy all the criteria of standards like acts of health and safety. In efforts to make good food, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Analysis is changing the standards of food and beverage production.

Economic.

Initiation of business where the capital income of each individual matters for the increased net sale as this differs country-to-country. The economy of the Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Business in U.S. is growing year by year with variable products launch specifically focusing on the nutritional food for infants.

Social.

The social environment continues changing with regard to time like the attitude of the consumer as well as their lifestyles. Any service or product of any company can not achieve success until the company is not concerned about the living system of the consumer. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is taking measures to fulfill its goals as the world is in search of healthy and tasty food.

Technological.

In the development of business, tactical procedures are somewhat mandatory. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is one of the leading famous multinational company and by time it buys different departments to take its products to new level. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is investing more on its R&D to make its products healthier and healthy providing customers with health benefits.

Legal.

There is no such effect of legal elements of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B as it is more worried over its laws and regulations.

Environmental

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B, in regards to environmental effect is dedicated to operate in eco-friendly environment with preservation of the natural resources and energy. If the resources used are recyclable or not, as due to the production of larger number of products there may be a hazard.

Competitive Forces Analysis (Porter's 5 Forces Design).

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Analysis has obtained a number of companies that assisted it in diversification and growth of its item's profile. This is the extensive explanation of the Porter's design of 5 forces of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Business, given up Display B.

Competitiveness.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is one of the leading company in this competitive market with a number of strong rivals like Unilever, Kraft foods and Group DANONE. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is running well in this race for last 150 years. The competitors of other business with Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is quite high.
Vrio Analysis
Danger of New Entrants.

A variety of barriers are there for the brand-new entrants to happen in the customer food industry. Just a couple of entrants succeed in this industry as there is a requirement to comprehend the customer need which requires time while current competitors are well aware and has actually progressed with the consumer commitment over their products with time. There is low risk of new entrants to Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B as it has quite large network of distribution globally controling with well-reputed image.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers.

In the food and beverage industry, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B owes the biggest share of market needing higher number of supply chains. This triggers it to be a picturesque buyer for the suppliers. Any of the provider has never expressed any complain about rate and the bargaining power is also low. In action, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has also been concerned for its suppliers as it believes in long-lasting relations.

Bargaining Power of Purchasers.

Therefore, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B makes sure to keep its customers satisfied. This has actually led Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B to be one of the faithful company in eyes of its buyers.

Hazard of Substitutes.

There has been an excellent hazard of substitutes as there are substitutes of some of the Nestlé's products such as boiled water and pasteurized milk. There has actually also been a claim that a few of its products are not safe to use resulting in the reduced sale. Hence, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B started highlighting the health advantages of its products to cope up with the alternatives.

Competitor Analysis.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Help covers much of the popular consumer brand names like Set Kat and Nescafe etc. About 29 brands amongst all of its brand names, each brand name made a revenue of about $1billion in 2010. Its major part of sale remains in North America constituting about 42% of its all sales. In Europe and U.S. the top significant brand names offered by Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B in these states have an excellent trusted share of market. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B, Unilever and DANONE are 2 big industries of food and drinks as well as its primary rivals. In the year 2010, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B had actually earned its yearly profit by 26% increase since of its increased food and drinks sale specifically in cooking stuff, ice-cream, beverages based on tea, and frozen food. On the other hand, DANONE, due to the increasing costs of shares resulting a boost of 38% in its revenues. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Help decreased its sales expense by the adjustment of a brand-new accounting procedure. Unilever has number of staff members about 230,000 and functions in more than 160 nations and its London headquarter. It has actually become the second largest food and beverage market in the West Europe with a market share of about 8.6% with only a distinction of 0.3 points with Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B. Unilever shares a market share of about 7.7 with Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B becoming very first and ranking DANONE as third. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B draws in regional customers by its low expense of the item with the regional taste of the items preserving its top place in the international market. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B business has about 280,000 workers and functions in more than 197 countries edging its competitors in many areas. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has actually likewise minimized its expense of supply by presenting E-marketing in contrast to its competitors.

Note: A quick contrast of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B with its close competitors is given up Display C.

SWOT Analysis.

The internal analysis and external of the business likewise can be done through SWOT Analysis, summed up in the Exhibition F.

Strengths.

• Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has an experience of about 140 years, making it possible for business to much better carry out, in different circumstances.
• Nestlé's has existence in about 86 nations, making it a worldwide leader in Food and Drink Market.
• Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has more than 2000 brand names, which increase the circle of its target consumers. Famous brands of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B consist of; Maggi, Kit-Kat, Nescafe, etc.
• Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Solution has large big of spending costs R&D as compare to its competitorsRivals making the company business launch release innovative ingenious nutritious healthyItems
• After embracing its NHW Method, the company has done large amount of mergers and acquisitions which increase the sales development and enhance market position of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.
• Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is a well-known brand with high customer's loyalty and brand name recall. This brand commitment of customers increases the chances of easy market adoption of numerous brand-new brand names of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.
Weak points.
• Acquisitions of those organisation, like; Kraft frozen Pizza service can provide a negative signal to Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B consumers about their compromise over their core proficiency of healthier foods.
• The growth I sales as compare to the business's financial investment in NHW Technique are rather various. It will take long to alter the perception of individuals ab out Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B as a company selling healthy and nutritious items.

Opportunities.

• Introducing more health related products enables the business to catch the market in which customers are quite conscious about health.
• Developing nations like India and China has biggest markets in the world. Expanding the market towards establishing nations can improve the Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B company by increasing sales volume.
• Continue acquisitions and joint endeavors increases the marketplace share of the business.
• Increased relationships with schools, hotel chains, restaurants and so on can also increase the variety of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Help consumers. Instructors can advise their students to buy Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B products.

Dangers.

• Financial instability in countries, which are the possible markets for Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B, can develop numerous problems for Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.
• Shifting of items from typical to healthier, causes additional costs and can result in decline company's profit margins.
• As Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has a complicated supply chain, therefore failure of any of the level of supply chain can lead the company to face certain issues.

Segmentation Analysis

Market Segmentation

The demographic division of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Analysis is based on four elements; age, earnings, gender and profession. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B produces several items related to infants i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and associated to grownups i.e. confectionary items. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B items are quite budget-friendly by nearly all levels, however its major targeted consumers, in regards to earnings level are upper and middle middle level customers.

Geographical Division

Geographical segmentation of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Study Solution is composed of its existence in practically 86 countries. Its geographical division is based upon 2 main aspects i.e. average income level of the consumer as well as the climate of the area. For example, Singapore Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Business's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the area i.e. hot, cold or warm.

Psychographic Division

Psychographic division of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B is based upon the personality and life style of the consumer. For instance, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose lifestyle is quite hectic and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Solution behavioral segmentation is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the client. For instance its highly nutritious products target those clients who have a health conscious mindset towards their usages.

VRIO Analysis

The VRIO analysis of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Company is a broad variety analysis offering the organization with a possibility to obtain a viable competitive advantage against its competitors in the food and drink industry, summed up in Exhibition I.

Belongings

The resources used by the Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B company are valuable for the business or not. Such as the resources like finance, human resources, management of operations and professionals in marketing. This are a few of the crucial valuable factors of for the identification of competitive benefit.

Unusual

The important resources used by Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B are even rare or expensive. If these resources are commonly found that it would be easier for the rivals and the brand-new competitors in the market to easily relocate competitors.

Replica

The imitation procedure is pricey for the rivals of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Solution Company. However, it can be done only in 2 different methods i.e. item duplication which is produced and manufactured by Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Business and introducing of the alternative of the products with changing expense. This increases the danger of disturbance to the recent structure of the market.

Company

This component of VRIO analysis handle the compatibility of the business to place in the market making productive use of its important resources which are challenging to mimic. Frequently, the development of management is completely dependent on the firm's execution strategy and group. Hence, this polishes the skills of the firm by time based on the choices made by company for the development of its tactical capitals.

Quantitative Analysis

R&D Spending as a percentage of sales are decreasing with increasing actual amount of spending shows that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D costs, and enable the company to more spend on R&D.

Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is declining. This indicator likewise shows a thumbs-up to the R&D spending, acquisitions and mergers.

Financial obligation ratio of the business is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio position a hazard of default of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B to its financiers and might lead a decreasing share costs. For that reason, in terms of increasing debt ratio, the firm ought to not spend much on R&D and should pay its existing financial obligations to reduce the risk for financiers.

The increasing danger of financiers with increasing debt ratio and decreasing share prices can be observed by big decrease of EPS of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Help stocks.

The sales development of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception structure of consumers. This slow growth likewise prevent business to additional spend on its acquisitions and mergers.( Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B, Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Financial Reports, 2006-2010).

Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of charts and calculations given in the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis.

TWOS analysis can be utilized to obtain numerous techniques based on the SWOT Analysis provided above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Exhibition H.

Methods to exploit Opportunities using Strengths.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Solution should introduce more ingenious items by big quantity of R&D Spending and acquisitions and mergers. It might increase the marketplace share of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B and increase the revenue margins for the business. It might likewise supply Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.

The international growth of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B need to be focused on market catching of establishing countries by growth, attracting more consumers through client's loyalty. As establishing nations are more populous than developed countries, it could increase the customer circle of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.

Techniques to Get Rid Of Weak Points to Exploit Opportunities.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Solution needs to do mindful acquisition and merger of companies, as it could impact the client's and society's perceptions about Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B. It needs to combine and obtain with those business which have a market credibility of healthy and healthy companies. It would enhance the perceptions of consumers about Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B ought to not only spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it should likewise concentrate on the R&D costs over assessment of expense of different healthy items. This would increase expense efficiency of its items, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to declining costs, and margins.

Methods to use strengths to get rid of risks.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Help should move to not just developing but likewise to developed nations. It needs to widens its geographical growth. This large geographical growth towards establishing and established nations would lower the risk of potential losses in times of instability in various nations. It ought to broaden its circle to numerous countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to conquer weak points to prevent dangers.

Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Analysis needs to sensibly manage its acquisitions to avoid the danger of misunderstanding from the customers about Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B. This would not only improve the perception of consumers about Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B however would also increase the sales, profit margins and market share of Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B.

Alternatives.

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the customer undamaged with the brand, there are 2 choices:.

Alternative: 1.

The Company needs to invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.

Pros:.

1. Acquisitions would increase total properties of the business, increasing the wealth of the company. However, spending on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The business can resell the acquired systems in the market, if it stops working to execute its technique. Quantity invest on the R&D might not be revived, and it will be thought about entirely sunk expense, if it do not provide potential results.
3. Spending on R&D provide slow development in sales, as it takes long period of time to introduce an item. Acquisitions offer quick results, as it supply the business currently established product, which can be marketed quickly after the acquisition.

Cons:.

1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the business's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face mistaken belief of consumers about Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B core worths of healthy and nutritious products.
2. Large costs on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of business's ineffectiveness of establishing innovative products, and would results in consumer's discontentment too.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the business by the products which are currently present in the market, making business not able to present new innovative products.

Alternative: 2

The Company ought to invest more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.

Pros:

1. It would allow the business to produce more ingenious products.
2. It would supply the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would enable the business to increase its targeted consumers by presenting those items which can be offered to a totally new market section.
4. Innovative products will offer long term advantages and high market share in long term.

Cons:

1. It would reduce the revenue margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be considered as sunk expense, and would impact the company at large. The danger is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which could supply an unfavorable signal to the investors, and might result I declining stock costs.

Alternative 3:

Continue its acquisitions and mergers with substantial costs on in R&D Program.

Pros:

1. It would allow the business to present brand-new ingenious products with less danger of converting the costs on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would supply a favorable signal to the financiers, as the overall assets of the company would increase with its significant R&D costs.
3. It would not affect the revenue margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the company a strong long term market position in regards to the business's total wealth along with in terms of ingenious items.

Cons:

1. Threat of conversion of R&D costs into sunk cost, greater than alternative 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Risk of misconception about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of ingenious products than alternative 2 and high variety of innovative products than alternative 1.

Suggestion

With the deep analysis of the above options, it is recommended that the business ought to pick the alternative 3 in order to keep a competitive position in the long run. As the alternative 3 would make it possible for the business to not just present brand-new and innovative items in the market it would likewise reduce the high expenses on R&D under alternative 2 and increase the profit margins. It would make it possible for the company to increase its share prices also, as financiers are willing to invest more in companies with significant R&D costs and boost in the overall worth of the business.

Action and execution Strategy

Method can be implemented successfully by developing specific short term as well as long term plans. These plans might be as follows;

Short-term Plan (0-1 year).

• Under the short term plan Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B Case Analysis must carry out numerous activities to implement its NHW technique effectively. These activities are as follows;.
• Get the audit of its brand name portfolio done, to take a look at the core selling brand names, which create most of its revenue.
• Analyze the existing target audience along with the marketplace sector which is not consist of in the business's circle.
• Evaluate the current monetary information to determine the amount that needs to be spent on the R&D and acquisitions.
• Examine the prospective financiers and their nature, i.e. do they desire long term advantages (capital gain), or the want early revenues (dividend). It would let the company to understand that how much amount must be spent on R&D.

Mid Term Plan (1-5 years).

• Acquire those organizations in which the business has prospective experience to handle. Obtain most beneficial organizations with a strong commitment to health, to develop the client's perceptions in the ideal direction.
• Focus more on acquisitions than R&D to build the base in the consumer's mind about Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B worths and vision and to prevent potential danger of sunk cost.

Long Term Plan (1-10 years).

• Acquire companies with health as well as taste aspect, as the base for the Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B as a company producing healthy products has been built under midterm plan and now the business might move towards taste element as well to comprehend the consumers, which focus more on taste rather than health.
• Be more aggressive towards R&D than the acquisitions, as it is the considerable time to develop new items.

Conclusion.
Recommendations
Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has actually stayed the leading market player for more than a decade. It has actually institutionalised its strategies and culture to align itself with the marketplace modifications and client behavior, which has ultimately allowed it to sustain its market share. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B has developed significant market share and brand name identity in the city markets, it is advised that the business must focus on the rural locations in terms of establishing brand name awareness, equity, and loyalty, such can be done by creating a specific brand allowance method through trade marketing methods, that draw clear distinction in between Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B items and other competitor products. Stolt Nielsen Transportation Group B needs to take advantage of its brand name image of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and likewise to upscale the offerings in other categories such as nutrition. This will permit the company to develop brand equity for recently presented and currently produced products on a greater platform, making the efficient usage of resources and brand name image in the market.