Panera Bread Company 3 Harvard Case Analysis

Home >> Finance >> Panera Bread Company 3

Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution and Analysis


Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Help is a worldwide company in Sweden. It is mainly a home furnishing business established by Ingvar Kamprad in 1943. He called the company at the age of 17 when he started his first mail-order company. It was called as IKEA by a combination of terms connecting to his personal life from his personalizes to his household farm i.e. Ignvar Kamprad Elmtaryd Agunnaryd. He started his vision to make true by offering his some items acquired by a cheap source for the regional merchants by newsletter ad. In 1948, by the additional ad in the newsletter about the furnishings has matched the requirements with its rivals. It has actually led to renounce the items sale and start with furniture. For the consumer complete satisfaction and lower the rate of returns, he purposely opened a store in an Almhult called municipality near his home town. Later, the small newsletter advertisement changed into a catalogue.

The competitors due to declined sale threatened the suppliers of IKEA to not take orders at low rates. In 1961, IKEA contracted with many of the factories making furniture and thus it once again came up with low expenses. On the other hand, Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Analysis divided its shop in a number of departments like low-cost rate snack bar, kids play-area, as well as a Sweden Store for the foods making it a popular exporter of food.

The motive of the business was to sale quality products with sensible costs with variation in items worldwide based on a vision to produce a better way of life for practically everybody. Every year, the company celebrates an anti-bureaucrat week to develop much better contact between the providers and consumers.
Executive 0Summary
In the mid period of 1990s, IKEA has a broad working networking with about 70 nations tracking down its items about 11,200. When there were environmental issues emerging about IKEA's items simultaneously the issuance on the child labor emerged. Due to this reason, Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution popularity decreased dropping the 20% of its sale in Denmark.

Key Gamers.

There are two key gamers in this case one is IKEA Business and other is its providers. IKEA's strategy is to outsource its product manufacturing to providers. These providers are generally 3rd party and based throughout the world.


The technique of outsourcing has some concerns like guidelines and policies of these countries. Sometimes providers from these underdeveloped countries does not follow required requirements as compare to developed countries. So these weak guidelines and guidelines can lead to weak environment policies or kid labour. There is unfavorable effect of these issues on earnings of the business and also reputation of the business. Due to the fact that most of the company's customers are based in developed nations. These customers have high expectations from Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Help in regards to good quality products with low expense. (Marianne Baxter, 2012) These customers have also high expectations from IKEA in element of social duty. They desired IKEA to be socially accountable and wanted that it did not have any connection with kid labour or any other environment problem. As IKEA got its supply of carpets mainly for under developed countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal. These under industrialized countries have unchecked kid labour. So this is primary issue that IKEA is facing just recently. The business is not managing its providers effectively. Underdeveloped countries enable kid labour because of poverty. So company can not depend upon city government for fixing this issue. IKEA methods likewise did not work well enough to resolve this issue (see Exhibit 3).

Approaching Concern of Child Labour.

IKEA method is to keep high level of social responsibility because it is one of the significant driver in success of company. IKEA is worried on child labour issue and other environmental concerns to support this technique.( Naidu & Ramaiah, 2006) Furthermore, Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Analysis was also encouraged by Swedish Conserve the Kid company to act "in the finest interest of kid".

Action to German manufacturers on Video Program:
Porter's 5 Forces Analysis
In response to the invite of German producers for IKEA, the invitation needs to require to be accepted. Specifically, Barner can possibly show her thought of mind with a clear justification letting individuals know that for her it is more important to be more concerned about the IKEA reputation as she is just accountable for this. It also offers Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Analysis to aware the German manufacturers to combat versus the kid labour.

As the German Manufacturers had actually only provided IKEA to see a few of the shots from their documentary. They should be asked for to let them enjoy the entire film rather of some shots which shows certainly an uncertain picture of the fact. This may be the strategy of German manufacturers to show themselves right versus the allegation but leaving IKEA behind full of doubts about their relationship with the business of India on the problem of kid labour.

On the contrary, the IKEA has been positively represented about the issue of Kid labour when the problem was at first put up by the Swedish Television. There are a set of details on kid labour by IKEA which was significantly collected by ILO and UNICEF.

As the tv market has excellent prospective to show false news as the fact by their excellent capability to modify any lie into a truth and makes individuals think on it without any doubts. It appears quite impossible for Barnerto examine the documentary before the session. As the German manufacturers refused to show their documentary to Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Analysis before it is telecasted merely indicates there evil intent of point the finger at someone and their relationships with IKEA perhaps. There might a strong contradiction that the IKEA is fearlessly engaged with an organization which uses kid as their labour and continue their relations to make profits with the suppliers while knowing the truth.

Additionally, Barner has a strong point of reason which is their philosophical declaration i.e. everyone makes mistakes but one takes its duty. The duty of the mistakes taken by anyone is thought about as the best source of pride.Despite of the fact that Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution was not conscious about the growing issue over the kid labour in addition to the including kid's as labours by the industries, the providers of the IKEA. Throughout the acceptance of agreement, IKEA began examination versus its supplier markets worldwide. If revealed in the documentary by German manufacturers, the management of IKEA is not afraid of accepting its errors. It will accept its mistake and take step to put it right once again.

Barner can also develop another reason on the ineffective responsibility over social concerns. It is planning to be involved with the social concerns however has not taken such measures yet. In the field of marketing, IKEA is on top with outstanding ideas in addition to its appealing items.
Swot Analysis
The concerns of the IKEA is towards leading long term relationships with its network of distribution globally. IKEA is not recently involved in any of the social activities about the rights and issues of each private working in the markets and making them a handsome profit. In future, IKEA will prepare to be part of obligation over the social issues.

It can be concluded that as per the issue for the company's track record and share of share should accept the invite and present it valid thoughts only in case if whatever in documentary is against the Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution. Particularly, IKEA had started a Foundation based on the principle of protecting rights of kid labour and to provide them with free environment to educate themselves. (Barlet, 2006).

Actions on Supply agreement with Rangan Exports:.

Under the IKEA issues about the most strategic and rational strategy in reference to the kid labour issue should provide Rangan Exports with another possibility to assist them in overcoming this problem.

IKEA requires to take some procedures in order to figure out of the truth. If the proof versus the Rangan export is true hence leading it in the failure on the ethical level which were outlaid by Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution. This clearly shows that on IKEA, the supplier market resulting in breach on the kid labour concern.

Subsequently, IKEA works with a vision of producing much better lifestyle for every individual which is a strong representation for the business to mean the rights of employees of Rangan Exports. The idea of child labour does not involve a single company as a huge network of business are accountable in putting it ahead. This is among the most vital issue of social issues and it would be oppression to blame a single one.

Barner can think about two options to resolve this problem. At first, either termination of the agreement with the Rangan Expors on the basis of involving kid labour to work after the examinations to be sure about the fact. If the management of IKEA not decides for the agreement termination, this brings a risk of losing brand position and credibility. This may lead to the monetary decline state of IKEA by reduced ratio of sale, less popularity of the brand name and the issues over social obligations. As it is surely not supported by the occupants if any nation to include child labour. This substitute is legal and trusted with the policy of IKEA. The primary disadvantage of this replacement is the IKEA deprivation with a worthwhile association and might lead to the ending relations with the sources of carpet by India.

This will help in maintenance of the healthy association in between the provider and the IKEA. This makes obvious for the all suppliers that IKEA is strictly against the child labour and really condemn it. This may have a bad effect on the market track record of IKEA by the generation of incorrect publicity.

As it is for the second time that IKEA ended up being a victim of child labour which has actually greatly damaged its reputation. For this purpose, Barner ought to pursue the aid by ILO and UNICEF as well as NGOs which may help Rangan in leaving the requirement to used child labour for the carpets production. It might choose to spread out awareness amongst the citizens worldwide about the social issues and how one's life is affected by in terms of social, and ethical values.

Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Analysis by the adoption of very first option, terminates its relationship with thesupplier violation. Then represent a bad impact on all suppliers by the increased power of bargaining and the offense of the policy of IKEA, if results in the failure. Additionally, it can make a charge for the behaviour which is not morally best. Therefore, Barner ought to make the decision of disuniting with Rangan public. Journalism should be called upon for the statement of their choice with its reason with the summarization of the policy of IKEA on the use labour of child. She should report all the whole scenario of the issue emerged and make sure that all the providers are strictly following the guidelines of the agreement. , if any of the supplier discovered in compliance to exploitation of the any of the contract guideline offering labour of child need to be fired.


In amount, the company can preserve its credibility in the market and in some way can bear the loss produced by one provider. With the stable track record in the market, Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Help will definitely cover its monetary crisis within a brief period of time.
Vrio Analysis
Technique Relating to IKEA's Operations in India

IKEA technique is generally concentrate on long term relationship with its providers rather than short-term. This long term technique helps IKEA in getting reliable and competitive supplier source. For long term relationship they utilized to assist their supplier to make full usage of their capability. For instance, they asked providers to offer product or services aside from their core products and services. The exact same technique that was used by IKEA in Poland could be borrowed.( Harapiak, 2013) The method was to outsource production of furnishings and not produce by its own. IKEA likewise requires to make sure that they involve public through its marketing actions which need to be useful in understanding IKEA's intents.

At earlier time IKEA had no focus on environmental and social issues which likewise includes child labor they utilized to focus on only one strategy i.e. offering cost effective and quality products to clients. That enhanced focus might assist Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution in improving its track record towards its clients. Stopping operations from India would not ensure option to kid labor but likewise negative track record would be constructed that IKEA is not taking any dependable action to solve fundamental issue i.e. kid labor.

There would be likewise one other unfavorable result i.e. dispute from public. As there is common view point that big business are constantly self-centered and are interested in just producing profit and consumers would be believing that IKEA is among them. Public has typical view that these business must be socially responsible to society as like they are needed to be accountable to its investors. If IKEA did not take any possible action to resolve problem of child labor then it would result in loss of sales and IKEA's value too. For a business like IKEA credibility loss is huge loss because worth of business also based upon it and likewise there would be decrease in revenues and goodwill if there is any track record loss.

If IKEA consider only sales figure then getting out from Indian market is more suitable. Since sales from Indian market only contributes little portion to IKEA's earnings.

IKEA required to make sure that child labor is not utilized for their items. For that function IKEA needs a system that can monitor entire procedure. As supplier has absence of financial resources to provide education to children, so IKEA must help provider economically and provide them financial help and ask to offset by future deliveries.

There could be one other solution for this issue that IKEA might install its own production company combined with school. IKEA ought to run this school by itself and its auditing task must be provided to any other institute like Rugman to make sure it is working correctly for finest interest of children.

Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution Needs To Sign up to Rugmark.

As IKEA has no experience concerning child labor so new personnel would be needed for this function. It should sign up to Rugmart becausethey are experienced in this field of kid labor and ask Rugmort to keep track of and establish procedure suggested by IKEA.

Resolving Origin of Kid Labor.

Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Analysis needs to solve root cause of kid labor in order to support its long term vision. IKEA starting performing its method in multi methods. If it is discovered that provider did not take any restorative action strategy then IKEA would broke agreement with that provider and there would be no trade with that particular provider in future.

Examination of Panera Bread Company 3 Case Help Strategy.

Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Solution has commitment to its customers to provide high quality items with low rates. Their strategy would make complete usage of engaging suppliers and work together to deal with problem of kid labor. According to my individual perception as from shareholders point of view, business is not utilizing its resources effectively through this strategy. They would be having difficult choice in future from deciding that whether to increase roi for shareholders or continue participation with social duties of Indian and UNICEF. Shareholders would be having unfavorable image of IKEA because of less return of investment if is greatly invests for social welfare. If IKEA remained in Indian market then it would lead to greater expenses for consumers. Conflicts of interest for society and management would be resolved. A client would not feel comfortable when he familiarized that he acquire a rug which was woven by kid however is now getting informed by supplier of IKEA. He would be feeling more comfortable when he came to understand that he buy a rug on somewhat greater cost which was not woven through child labor.

The main issue that IKEA is dealing with presently is kid labor since a German documentary maker makes documentary of a supplier of IKEA that was utilizing child labor for production of items. It was also concluded that Panera Bread Company 3 Case Study Help needs to sign up Rugmart because IKEA has no any understanding regarding child labor and Rugmart is professional having knowledge relating to problems of kid labor. As IKEA has no experience relating to child labor so new staff would be needed for this function.